Question: Is I Wish I Were There Grammatically Correct?

Is if I were a boy grammatically correct?

You should always use the subjunctive after if to suggest a hypothetical situation e.g.

if I were lucky, if it were to rain, if I were a boy, if I were you.

But in casual, informal, spoken language, many people use the present tense e.g.

if I was lucky, if it was to rain, if I was a boy, if I was you..

Why do we say if I were?

The reason we use WERE instead of WAS is because the sentence is in the SUBJUNCTIVE mood which is used for hypothetical situations. This is a condition which is contrary to fact or reality (the fact is, I am NOT you). In the subjunctive mood we use IF + I / HE / SHE / IT + WERE for the verb To Be.

Was or were in a sentence?

Was is used in the first and third person singular past. It is used for statements of fact. Were is used in the second person singular and plural and first and third person plural. It is used in the subjunctive mood to indicate unreal or hypothetical statements.

Are and were difference?

Are – is for plural, and present. They are there. Were – also for plural, but for past. They were there a second ago.

Were True or true?

There is often confusion about were (a past subjunctive) and was (a past indicative) after wish. In conditional sentences where the condition is unreal or not yet real and in that clauses after to wish, use were: I wish it were true that he loved me.

What is the subjunctive mood in English?

The subjunctive mood is one of three moods in English grammar. The subjunctive mood is for expressing wishes, suggestions, or desires, and is usually indicated by an indicative verb such as wish or suggest, paired then with a subjunctive verb.

Is I wish I grammatically correct?

Nope! “I wish I were” is actually the preference of grammar experts because you’re talking about something that hasn’t actually occurred.

Would that I were?

Without a subject, this idiomatic expression can carry a slightly different emphasis, making the expression more passive or general than the simple I wish that. … Hence, would that it were so simple is an archaic, idiomatic way of saying if only it were so simple.

Do you say there were or there was?

Answer #1 is correct; use the plural verb, were, because there are multiple toys. … If you were talking about 1 pile of toys though, you would use “was,” the singular verb, because there is 1, single pile. For example: “There was a pile of toys on the living room floor!”

Had Should were instead of if?

walk the other way! was / were – We often use were instead of was after if. Both was and were are used in formal English, but only was is used in informal English.

What is a subjunctive verb?

In most cases, the subjunctive form of a verb is usually the third-person form of the verb with the ‑s dropped, but the verb to be is a special case. The subjunctive is used after certain expressions that contain an order or a request, a hypothetical, or a wish.

Which is correct grammatically correct if I was or if I were?

“I were” is called the subjunctive mood, and is used when you’re are talking about something that isn’t true or when you wish something was true. If she was feeling sick… <-- It is possible or probable that she was feeling sick. "I was" is for things that could have happened in the past or now.

Is it if I were there or if I was there?

The correct sentence should be – if I had been there – because this is a hypothetical situation. The situation was not taken care of, so clearly the statement is not true. Hence, we should use ‘were’ and not ‘was’.

Can you say if I were?

Many people use if I was and if I were interchangeably to describe a hypothetical situation. The confusion occurs because when writing in the past tense, I was is correct while I were is incorrect. However, when writing about non-realistic or hypothetical situations, if I were is the only correct choice.

Is it if there was or if there were?

“What if there were a stack overflow on…” because it is not true. It’s a condition that is contrary-to-fact. If it were talking about something true that had occurred in the past, then “was” would be appropriate, but the “what if” automatically triggers a condition so it’s in definite need of the subjunctive.

Would that I were rich?

Would that I were rich! This sentence using ‘would’ is the simple present tense version. It simply implies, ‘if I was rich, then I could do something’. Usually, ‘would’ is the past tense version of ‘will’. … It shows a different response sometimes / or explain hypothetical situation, if the past had been different.

Has been or have been?

“Has been” is used in the third-person singular and “have been” is used for first- and second-person singular and all plural uses. … “Had been” is the past perfect tense and is used in all cases, singular and plural.

What is the difference between wasn’t and weren t?

The use of were and weren’t in the subordinate clauses depends on the reality or truthfulness of the subordinate clause. If it is true, then the indicative forms was and wasn’t are in order. If it is not true, i.e. counterfactual, then the past subjunctive forms were and weren’t are used.